Author(s):
Tyler A. Beeton, Anthony S. Cheng, Melanie M. Colavito
Year Published:

Cataloging Information

Topic(s):
Human Dimensions of Fire Management
Recovery after fire
Restoration

NRFSN number: 24666
FRAMES RCS Number: 65137
Record updated: June 15, 2022

Collaboration is increasingly emphasized as a tool to realize national-level policy goals in public lands management. Yet, collaborative governance regimes (CGRs) are nested within traditional bureaucracies and are affected by internal and external disruptions. The extent to which CGRs adapt and remain resilient to these disruptions remains under-explored. Here, we distill insights from an assessment of the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP) projects and other CGRs. We asked (1) how do CGRs adapt to disruptions? and (2) what barriers constrained CGR resilience? Our analysis is informed by a synthesis of the literature, case examples and exemplars from focus groups, and a national CFLRP survey. CGRs demonstrated the ability to mobilize social capital, learning, resources, and flexibility to respond to disruptions. Yet authority, accountability, and capacity complicated collaborative resilience. We conclude with policy and practice recommendations to cultivate collaborative resilience moving forward.

Citation

Beeton, Tyler A.; Cheng, Antony S.; Colavito, Melanie M. 2022. Cultivating collaborative resilience to social and ecological change: an assessment of adaptive capacity, actions, and barriers among collaborative fores restorattion groups in the United States. Journal of Forestry 120(3):316-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvab064

Access this Document