Wildfires can have severe and lasting impacts on the water quality of aquatic ecosystems. However, our understanding of these impacts is founded primarily from studies of small watersheds with well-connected runoff regimes. Despite the predominance of large, low-relief rivers across the fire-prone Boreal forest, it is unclear to what extent and duration wildfire-related material (e.g., ash) can be observed within these systems that typically buffer upstream disturbance signals. Following the devastating 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire in western Canada, we initiated a multi-faceted water quality monitoring program that suggested brief (hours to days) wildfire signatures could be detected in several large river systems, particularly following rainfall events greater than 10 mm. Continuous monitoring of flow and water quality showed distinct, precipitation-associated signatures of ash transport in rivers draining expansive (800–100,000 km2) and partially-burned (<1–22 percent burned) watersheds, which were not evident in nearby unburned regions. Yields of suspended sediment, nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus) and metals (lead, others) from impacted rivers were 1.2–10 times greater than from those draining unburned regions. Post-fire suspended sediment concentrations in impacted rivers were often larger than pre-fire 95% prediction intervals based on several years of water sampling. These multiple lines of evidence indicate that low-relief landscapes can mobilize wildfire-related material to rivers similarly, though less-intensively and over shorter durations, than headwater regions. We propose that uneven mixing of heavily-impacted tributaries with high-order rivers may partially explain detection of wildfire signals in these large systems that may impact downstream water users.