Skip to main content
Author(s):
Katie Knotek, Alan E. Watson, William T. Borrie, Joshua G. Whitmore, David Turner
Year Published:

Cataloging Information

Hot Topic(s):
Topic(s):
Fire & Recreation
Fire & Wilderness

NRFSN number: 16051
Record updated:

Research at the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex in Montana explored differences in recreation visitors’ attitudes towards the use of management-ignited prescribed fires in the wilderness. A mail-back survey of visitors (n = 291) during the 2004 season revealed that over half of visitors would accept prescribed fires in wilderness. This support did not vary by ignition purpose: (a) to restore the natural role of fire or (b) to reduce hazardous fuels and potential for fire escaping to non-wilderness lands. Local visitors, however, were significantly more accepting of prescribed fires than non-local visitors across both ignition purposes. A smaller proportion of visitors than was expected considered the presence of natural fire undesirable.

Citation

Knotek K, Watson AE, Borrie WT, Whitmore JG, Turner D. 2008. Recreation visitor attitudes towards management-ignited prescribed fires in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, Montana. J Leisure Research 40(4), p. 608-618.
The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.