A JFSP Fire Science Exchange Network
Bringing People Together & Sharing Knowledge in the Northern Rockies

Conservatism, efficiency, and the value of life

Author(s): Douglas MacLean, Claudia Mills
Editor(s): Andrew Kirby
Year Published: 1990

Many organizations are faced with unavoidable dangers that may harm employees during their regular work. However, despite organizational efforts, it is often unrealistic for employees to be responsible for avoiding all possible risk. Employees must get the job done despite the dangers they may face. In this chapter, MacLean and Mills discuss the arguments for and against a conservative view of risk taking and then argue in favor of a “bounded” notion of conservative behavior. Since society largely determines what is considered “risky,” managers need to be aware of three structural levels that control how organizations define “risk”. First, risk is defined by those who make the laws for and against taking risks on a national and state scale. Second, risk is reshaped by those who interpret the previously defined laws in order to apply them to the organization. Third, individuals and agencies that must assess organizational risk may change the bias of risk taking in favor of a more conservative approach.

Citation: MacLean D, Mills C. 1990. Conservatism, efficiency, and the value of life. In: Kirby A, ed. Nothing to fear: risks and hazards in American society. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press: p. 53-74.
Topic(s): Risk
Ecosystem(s): None
Document Type: Book or Chapter or Journal Article
NRFSN number: 15868
Record updated: Nov 27, 2017