Skip to main content
Author(s):
Matt P. Plucinski, Elsa Pastor
Year Published:

Cataloging Information

Topic(s):
Fire & Economics

NRFSN number: 12414
FRAMES RCS number: 16294
Record updated:

Aircraft are often used to drop suppressants and retardants to assist wildfire containment. Drop effectiveness has rarely been measured due to the difficulties in collecting data from wildfires and running field experiments and the absence of definitions and measures. This paper presents a set of criteria and methodologies for evaluating the effectiveness of aerial suppression drops. These consider drop placement, coverage and effect on fire behaviour. This paper also details drop site and delivery conditions that are required for determining causal factors that influence drop effectiveness and allow drops to be compared. Examples of drop impact evaluations made during experimental fires are used to demonstrate these methodologies. The main methods proposed are based on the analysis of orthorectified airborne infrared imagery of drops, which can be used to measure drop dimensions, proximity to fire perimeter and their effect on fire spread. These evaluations can be used to compare tactics, suppressants and delivery systems and to inform cost-benefit analyses of aerial suppression.

Citation

Plucinski, Matt P.; Pastor, Elsa. 2013. Criteria and methodology for evaluating aerial wildfire suppression. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 22(8): 1144-1154.

Access this Document