Following publication of the original article (Hyde et al., 2015), the authors have noticed two errors in the summarizing of our results and wish to point out the following corrections:

– The LANDFIRE-FCCS layer showed a 200% higher duff loading relative to measured loadings, not the “300%” stated in the abstract – The 200% stated in the results is correct.

– In the first paragraph of results, LANDFIRE-FLM CWD loading was one seventh that of measured or LANDFIRE-FCCS loadings not the “9 times lower” included in the original text.

The values in our tables and figures are correct, however these two points of summary required correction. We have checked the rest of the article to ensure all other results, tables, and conclusions were not affected by these summary corrections.